Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Simon McKeown's avatar

I think the problem for developing players isn't just not playing enough red ball cricket, they don't play enough of any type of cricket. Bar the internationals, they are playing 15 interpro games if a player was to play all of them. How do they develop? Like unless fast tracked from 19s there is nothing

Larry Leprechaun's avatar

Sarah comes from a sport where there is only one Test held every four years - the Olympics. That is all she needs to now about what Test cricket means & why it must remain the pinnacle. On its own, the Olympics looks like an incredibly expensive exercise but the "value" it generates - from aspiring youngsters wanting to compete one day & participate in sport to the viewer who wants to see the best of the best perform on the elite stage. Money should not be the basis of any discussion when it comes to Test cricket. Find it separately. Or get the right people who can find it. The fat trimming is not cutting out Test cricket nor the Emerald Challenge - its the fat within CI HQ that have become comfortable over the years. What is the cost of not hosting a Test nor Emerald Challenge? I hate the ETPL but you watch them promote the upcoming tournament compared to what CI will do the Indian matches with a 15yo demigod as the best promotion ETPL could only dream of!

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?