Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Barry O'Keeffe's avatar

For selectors, especially with batting, their job is hard. It is not just ability, I think there are a lot of players with cigarette paper difference on that. Or runs/ averages, a lot depends on the wickets the quality of the bowling.

I think the real differential is when are the hard runs scored. It difficult to compare a 100 scored on a benign pitch against a moderate attack on a sunny day, against a 40 on a wearing pitch seeing the team to a narrow win.

I’m afraid that my English-centric self and my middle-agedness will appear. Ramparkash was the most beautiful batsmen, had endless recalls to the England team, but I cannot recall that match winning/saving innings, whereas Collingwood did not have those gifts, by there was a steely resolution to him, he averaged over 40 and people (well those of a certain vintage) remember the 2009 Cardiff test, famous for the Anderson Panesar 10 wicket partnership, but before that it was Collingwood who defied the Aussie attack for hours making a hard earned 80+

I guess McBrine is probably the best example of what I mean by this. Not an elegant batsman, but no one can recall him giving his wicket away, and I suspect his average it not much better than Tector or Stirling

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts